Skip to main content

HomeThe Jury FilesThe Fourth Jury

The Jury Files · No. 3

The Fourth Jury

Central Criminal Court, Darlinghurst, Sydney · May Sittings, 1889

Three juries could not agree. You are the fourth. You are on the jury.

CourtSydney, New South Wales, 1889
ChargeMurder
PlaySolo, or 6 to 12 in the room
StatusComing soon
The case

The case against Albert Edward Durrant.

Albert Edward Durrant, a tally clerk of thirty five, is on trial for the fourth time for poisoning his brother-in-law George Pellow, a master cooper, with arsenic in his nightly cocoa in September 1888.

Three juries could not agree. Before a word of evidence, the newspapers have told the city what to think: a weak case, a widow who gained, and a jury that "stood eight to four".

The case is original fiction: the people and the crime are invented, and no real person is portrayed. The court, the year and the law are taken from the period, and the case says so openly wherever it departs from them.

In the dock

The people at the heart of it.

Portrait of Albert Edward Durrant, as imagined for the case
Albert Edward Durrant
The prisoner, 35, tally clerk
Portrait of George Henry Pellow, as imagined for the case
George Henry Pellow
The deceased, 46, master cooper
What the jury must decide

The questions put to you.

Verdicts open to you: Guilty or not guilty, and it must be unanimous. Nobody tells you the answer before you give yours. The truth plays after the verdict, whichever verdict it is.

Whether the Crown has proved it

That Albert Durrant put arsenic in George Pellow's cocoa, meaning to kill him, beyond reasonable doubt.

What to leave outside the room

Everything the newspapers have printed about the first three trials. You try the case on the evidence you hear.

Whether twelve people can agree

Where three juries before you could not. A hung jury is a legitimate outcome here too.

The law of the court, in plain English

  • In New South Wales in 1889 a prisoner could not give evidence on oath. Albert Durrant makes an unsworn statement from the dock and cannot be questioned.
  • The verdict must be unanimous. There is no majority verdict and no "not proven".
  • A New South Wales jury of 1889 was twelve men. Players of any gender take any juror card.
Two ways to sit on this jury

Solo, or the whole room.

The trial is the same either way: the same witnesses, the same exhibits, the same summing up. Only who argues with you in the jury room changes.

Coming soon
Solo
A$29 / case

One juror: you. The other eleven are AI jurors who argue, point to exhibits and can be persuaded, or not.

Tell me when it launches
Coming soon
Group
A$39 / case

Six to twelve people in the room, each with a juror card. The host is the foreperson: holds the remote, reads the judge's directions if the sound is off, and calls the votes.

Tell me when it launches

Nothing is on sale yet, and no money is taken for a case that cannot be played. See all 32 jury cases.

Coming soon

Be told when The Fourth Jury opens.

Leave your email and we will write once, when the Jury Files are ready to play.

Nothing is on sale yet and nothing is charged. One email when it is ready, unsubscribe whenever. We handle your address as set out in our privacy policy.